User talk:203.219.85.18

Easter EggsEdit

I've noticed that a lot of the comments you're making on the Skyrim Easter Eggs page seem to be disagreement with the consensus of other editors for disagreement's sake. What you have to understand is that the editors who post on that talk page have been doing so for a long time, and have a better idea of what does and does not belong on that page than you seem to. Whenever there's some doubt, we defer to consensus to decide what does and doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion. When you comment on egg proposals that have already reached consensus just to contest that consensus, you're only serving to incite tension. I would suggest that you read the notices at the top of both the main eggs page and the talk page, as well as some of the old archived proposals, which can give you a better idea of what we tend to look for and our reasoning for accepting or rejecting proposals. If you have a problem with a particular egg being mentioned, you're free to bring it up on the talk page, just like you did with the Minecraft entry. In the meantime, I would ask that you try to understand the decision making process for eggs before dismissing the opinions of everyone else on the subject. Thanks! ThuumofReason (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2013 (GMT)

apologies to all i misunderstood the rules of UESP to be the same generic rules as any wiki and ended up with a sevre case of foot in my mouth. trying to be somewhat more productive now. have already learnt certain topics are best avoided due to who moderates what. thanks for the heads up on that *wink*.203.219.85.18 08:50, 28 January 2013 (GMT)