| This is an archive of past UESPWiki:Deletion Review discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page, except for maintenance such as updating links. |
Skyrim:Water Walking
Spell effect seems to not be used in game. --Lukish_ Tlk Cnt 14:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose: There is in fact an effect in the game called "Waterwalking". Meaning the article may need to be renamed, but there is no immediately obvious reason why it should be deleted. It's possible it's an effect that's only used by creatures rather than available to the player, but we can't figure that out definitively right now. Which gets to the real problem, which is that the whole deletion review is a bit of overkill right now. We haven't even figured out how to handle the magic effects in Skyrim (in part because there are 958 of them). We can hardly even tell what effects are being used, or whether they're available for alchemy or enchanting, or how much they cost, or nearly any hard facts about any of the effects. Once we establish how to organize all of them, then it will be appropriate to start discussing which ones to keep and which ones to delete, and most of those questions will be easier to handle at that point. In the meantime, I think any major discussion about what needs to be deleted is premature and unnecessary. --NepheleTalk 16:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Consensus: Keep. – Robin Hood↝talk 01:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)